Subscribe to our weekly round-up of the LGBTQIA+ world and support queer creatives to kick start their career ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€โšง๏ธ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ

There are consequences for peddling 'groomer' lies about LGBTQIA+ people
Explainer

There are consequences for peddling 'groomer' lies about LGBTQIA+ people

Jamie Wareham
Jamie Wareham
TL;DR: This week Lawrence Fox was found to have libelled two queer people for his baseless accusations of them being peadophiles. It sends a clear message to anyone who publishes content, which in the eyes of the law extends to social media posts, that peddling the false 'groomer' narrative has legal consequences.

The pervasive lie that LGBTQIA+ people are akin to paedophiles - that we are 'subversives' or 'groomers' - is a narrative that has been around long before the modern queer rights movement kicked into action.

But it's one that still regularly rears its ugly head, despite years of progression on human rights.

This week, former actor, GB News presenter and self declared 'politician' Lawrence Fox was found to have libelled Drag Race UK queen Crystal and former Stonewall trustee Simon Blake for calling them "paedophiles" in tweets in 2020.

It's a striking ruling in an era of anti-trans hate, 'groomer' narratives and LGBTQIA+ prejudice being published second by second on social media.

What did the Lawrence Fox libel ruling say?

Laurence Fox libelled two people when he referred to them as "paedophiles" on social media in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury's to celebrate Black History Month - The Guardian

The judge ruled that:

"Mr Fox's labelling of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour as paedophiles was, on the evidence, probabilities and facts of this case, seriously harmful, defamatory and baseless. The law affords few defences to defamation of this sort. Mr Fox did not attempt to show these allegations were true, and he was not able to bring himself on the facts within the terms of any other defence recognised in law."

In response to the case Fox had put in a counter-claim about their accusations of him being racist. However these were deemed by the judge to have been "unlikely to have harmed his reputation". Harm is a significant factor in the outcome of a libel case. He blamed the accusations in this exchange for being the "career-ending" and "a reputation-destroying allegation" - Sky News

How have Crystal and Lawrence Fox responded?

The Drag Queen star, who goes by Colin Seymour out of drag, said the case has left them with a mix of feelings. Ultimately, they said, it โ€œreminds people that we donโ€™t need to sit and take it when people are throwing around baseless slursโ€ - Gay Times

Meanwhile, Laurence Fox has made multiple posts on X, including accusing the judge of being unable to โ€œdefine racismโ€. Crystal said Fox and those like him should learn โ€œhow to apologiseโ€ - PinkNews

Analysis: A warning to all those who peddle the 'groomer' narrative

In UK law publishing lies in words - in whatever form, platform or place - opens you up to a libel lawsuit. That's true whoever you are and wherever you do it - whether it's in a book, in a newspaper, or, crucially, on platforms like X.

These kinds of cases, and rulings are rare though, for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the bar to prove libel is high - though in this case, it was found to have been clearly met.

But the main reason we haven't seen many cases like this, despite the vast array of these disgusting allegations online, is because of the high costs associated with taking these disputes to the courts.

Crystal and Blake have made it clear why they felt so compelled to take this case to court, they wanted it to send a reverberation to anyone peddling these lies - and to the victims of that kind of hate.

This ruling sends a clear signal that publishing false, baseless accusations against LGBTQIA+ people and drag queens, likening them to paedophiles or 'groomers', will land you in court and on the losing side.


What have you worked out about 2024 already?

  • You know it's not enough for you alone to understand the LGBTQIA+ world - we need everyone to.
  • You want to play your part in helping to change the media - so it can shift the narrative on queer lives positively.
  • You believe in a different kind of queer news - focused on creating content because it counts for the community, not for clicks.
  • You want to join a community of like-minded queers dedicated to supporting marginalised LGBTQIA+ people - who want to make the world better place.

QueerAF is a growing community of members who want to change the media by supporting LGBTQIA+ creatives' careers.

Every membership helps fund our unique approach to queer journalism, as well as our wider work shifting the media landscape so it works for us, not against us.